Yes, you should be able to create a IPSec VPN tunnel with both. This
link, http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/network/bb545655.aspx, should
have most of the information for the MS end.
Ted
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 7:32 PM
To: cisco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: vpn client questions [7:128257]
I have a box at home that I use when I have to connect from home. I
installed windows 2003 so I could use it as a guniea pig for windows
stuff.
If I want to connect to my VPN account I usually have to use a VM. I
was
just curious if there was any way to accomplish this as the machine is
not
that fast and VMware is very slow on it. Is there a way to connect to a
cisco 3000 using RRAS?
Ted Kim wrote:
>
> What was the purpose of this? Were you trying to get a remote
> server
> connected to a corporate network elsewhere? If so, why not use
> RRAS?
>
> Ted
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 6:00 PM
> To: cisco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: OT: vpn client questions [7:128257]
>
> Has anyone been able to get the cisco vpn client working in
> windows
> server
> 2003? I successfully installed it and imported my profile.
> However,
> when I
> connect it says that the OS failed to recognize the adapter.
> I'm
> assuming
> it means that the 2k3 doesn't like the virtual adapter that the
> client
> creates, even though it is listed in the network connections
> tab and
> enabled. I just guessing though as neither vendor's website
> was of much
> help.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=128315&t=128257
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
