- A virtual community of network engineers
 Home  BookStore  StudyNotes  Links  Archives  StudyRooms  HelpWanted  Discounts  Login
RE: Wan design recomendations [7:113372] posted 09/05/2006
[Chronological Index] [Thread Index] [Top] [Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Make sure you get and review the BGP peering policy if you should choose
to venture that path. I would recommend OSPF as my first choice.


On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 15:09 -0400, Jojo jojo wrote:
> It depends!!!!!
> Probably OSPF, at least thats the way I did it with HSRP, GLBP where 
> required, dual service provider for BGP, some issues there so watch out!
> Like I said it depends on your euqipment and plan of attack.
> hth
> JoJo
> >From: "price jeff" 
> >Reply-To: "price jeff" 
> >To: cisco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: Wan design recomendations [7:113372]
> >Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 15:03:54 -0400
> >
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I have a client that is wanting to increase the bandwidth and fault
> >tolerance at thier primary site.  They have around 200 remote sites
> >rip as a routing protocol.  They would like to spilt out the remotes sites
> >between 2 routers with half the sites going to one router and having pvcs 
> >to
> >the other router for fail over. What would be the best way to accomplish 
> >this?
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >jeff

Message Posted at:
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: