At 02:04 PM 2/13/2004, Joseph Rothstein wrote:
>I just set this up myself, and the same thing ahppens. I have yet to figure
>out why. I know that ISIS is different than other routing protocols, but no
>one can explain to me why. This also happnes with EIGRP. The solution is
>easy, but why do you have to use it.
The routes in question are not ISIS routes from the perspective of the
local router given the connected interface supercedes them. Hence,
redistributing connected is necessary if you wish to push them to another
protocol process. I recall a thread in CCIE-Lab about this maybe a year or
so ago that more illustrative.
>Post if you find out why.
>
>Regards,
>Joe
>
>P.S. Maybe we should send an e-mail to Radia Perlman and ask her since she
>
>invented it.
a hair split, but this is purely an implementation issue so you'd need to
bug someone who was at c who wrote the code.
>**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=84395&t=84085
--------------------------------------------------
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
