GroupStudy.com GroupStudy.com - A virtual community of network engineers
 Home  BookStore  StudyNotes  Links  Archives  StudyRooms  HelpWanted  Discounts  Login
RE: Kpps vs. Bandwidth [7:76249] posted 09/26/2003
[Chronological Index] [Thread Index] [Top] [Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]


At 6:20 PM +0000 9/26/03, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>From what I understand, the PPS ratings are based on the bandwidth
>(capacity) of the interfaces that can be added to a router. Marketing
>engineers (yes, an oxymoron), load up the routers with high-speed interfaces
>and start whipping through the smallest possible packets. That way they get
>high PPS numbers.





http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2544.txt is a good start on how this 
really should be done.

I would note that this deals with forwarding speed; control plane 
(e.g., convergence) is a completely different problem.

>
>The number of packets that they can send through an interface depends on the
>bandwidth (capacity, speed) of that interface and other things like Zsombor
>mentioned such as Ethernet preambles and inter-frame gaps, (which don't
>apply to WAN links, though).
>
>So, the question is sort of backwards. The PPS number comes from a
>fully-loaded router with high-bandwidth connections. During development,
>Cisco does similar tests to determine what "fully loaded" will mean.
>
>To come up with a better answer regarding the amount of traffic a router can
>handle, which I think was the gist of your question, you would need to
>analyze the traffic volume and arrival rates, the buffering behavior of the
>router, the amount of RAM in the router, etc. Then we start getting into the
>realm of that other discussion going on about uilitzation and bandwidth. :-)
>
>Bandwidth just means capacity. What something is capable of may not match
>what it really does. Throughput, which is what you really care about, is a
>measurement of actual data that can be sent per timeframe. Since packet
>sizes vary, and aren't all the tiny ones used in the marketing tests, you
>need to do your own measurements with your own traffic, at the time of day
>where it matters, etc.
>
>Priscilla
>
>
>Evan You wrote:
>>
>>  I know how many packets per second that each router can handle.
>>  How do you
>>  convert that to how much bandwidth that a router can handle.
>>  For example, I
>>  have a 2622 that is running at full E1/1984K (average is 80%
>>  utilization and
>>  it peaks often) and the CPU is at 25% to 30%. I know that this
>>  router can
>>  handle 15Kpps. So how does Kpps translate to bandwidth?  I read
>>  in another
>  > thread that a DS-3 is equivalent to 150Kpps.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=76275&t=76249
--------------------------------------------------
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html