Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670] posted 06/29/2002
- Subject: Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670]
- From: "Michael L. Williams" <MichaelWilliams@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 12:35:28 -0400
I had heard that there was an RFC pertaining to using a /31 on
Point-to-Point links only (in which case there is no need for a
network/broadcast address). Has this been implemented in (Cisco) network
equipment yet? Is the RFC complete?
Anyone know? Priscilla? Howard?
"Gaz" wrote in message
> Thought that's what you meant but thought I'd clarify before I made a
> pillock of myself.
> Now I've clarified I'll steam on and make a pillock of myself :-)
> I don't know how long it's been now (quite a while), but yes both of these
> are used these days. "ip subnet-zero" command is useful for this.
> I'm sure there are situations where this is still not a good idea, and I'm
> sure people will jump in and give you the low down any minute now, but
> had no problems with using them.
> Also - not used it much other than playing around, but 31 bit mask is
> available as well so you've only got a network and broadcast address to
> with. I've never been that short of addresses that I want to complicate it
> that much.
Message Posted at:
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx