There should be nothing particularly shocking about being able to take full
BGP routes with a "small" router like a 2650. BGP doesn't use up as much
resources as a lot of people seem to think.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/41.shtml
""Neal Rauhauser 402-301-9555"" wrote in message
news:200206072157.RAA03105@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> This is a 2650 getting full routes from AT&T and UUNet with a T1 to each
> provider.
>
>
> Total: 101929412, Used: 67234276, Free: 34695136
> PID TTY Allocated Freed Holding Getbufs Retbufs Process
> 0 0 75536 1808 4650980 0 0 *Init*
> 0 0 752 970112 752 0 0 *Sched*
> 0 0 17642116 10399220 187676 163440 0 *Dead*
> 1 0 280 280 3864 0 0 Load Meter
>
> 2 0 9028 212388 9920 780 0 OSPF Hello
>
> 3 0 0 664 6864 0 0 Check
> heaps
> 4 0 20248 0 27112 0 0 Chunk
> Manager
> 5 0 20008464 24080 199956 6131440 10880 Pool
> Manager
> 6 0 280 280 6864 0 0 Timers
> 7 0 280 280 6864 0 0 Serial
> Backgroun
> 8 0 0 0 6864 0 0
> ALARM_TRIGGER_SC
> 9 0 280 280 6864 0 0
> Environmental mo
> 10 0 6596964 31309820 36792 1641380 0 ARP Input
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46097&t=46066
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
