In terms of what they actually achieve ..
I think they would both be the same ..
They both will ALLWAYS orginate a route ,
1 will as it will always have a default route ( via your null0 statement )
2.will as it has the "always" statement added.
I think the question would lead you down either path
1.
At the front of your lab there is NO mention about the use of static routes.
Q says ,
create a permenant default route within OSPF ,without using the "default
information-originate always" statement.
2.at the front of your lab there IS an explicit instruction stating "you
must not use static routes"
Q says ,
create a permenant default router within OSPF, do not add any new
Non-dynamic routes to your routing table.
I am no good at writing question , but that sounds pretty good to me :>
HTH
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Nitro Drops
Sent: 14 October 2008 19:33
To: ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: OSPF Default Information-Orignate
Hi All,
Any differences between the followings 2, and under what scenarios do i use
them for OSPF?
1.) default information-originate + ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 null0
2.) default information-originate always
Much appreciated for any kind replies.
Cheers
Nit
_________________________________________________________________
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1725 - Release Date: 10/14/2008
9:25 PM
