GroupStudy.com GroupStudy.com - A virtual community of network engineers
 Home  BookStore  StudyNotes  Links  Archives  StudyRooms  HelpWanted  Discounts  Login
Re: Enabling broadcast for the same PVC twice or enabling it just once would achieve the same result? posted 05/24/2008
[Chronological Index] [Thread Index] [Top] [Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Most routing protocols use the link local address for exchanging hellos and updates. Therefore in most scenarios they would have the same effect. However, not enabling broadcast on the 2033:: subnet could impact any IPV6 multicast if you have a requirement for it in real life. I don't think IPV6 multicast is on the R&S blueprint yet.

Bill

ccie wrote:
Hi experts,



Is there is any difference between these implantations ?



Int ser0/0/0

frame-relay map ipv6 FE80::21E:4AFF:FE6B:FF3E 601 broadcast

frame-relay map ipv6 2033:3:3:16::1 601 broadcast



vs.



int ser0/0/0

frame-relay map ipv6 FE80::21E:4AFF:FE6B:FF3E 601 broadcast

frame-relay map ipv6 2033:3:3:16::1 601



Enabling broadcast for the same PVC twice or enabling it just once would
achieve the same result?



Regards,

Amin


_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html