GroupStudy.com GroupStudy.com - A virtual community of network engineers
 Home  BookStore  StudyNotes  Links  Archives  StudyRooms  HelpWanted  Discounts  Login
Re: Frame PVC, LMI and Map Show Commands - Point Verification posted 12/03/2007
[Chronological Index] [Thread Index] [Top] [Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]


In case you are using a back-to-back Frame relay (i.e. 2 routers without an
FR Switch), you can use "no keep-alive" on both interfaces so that the
interfaces don't go down if LMI's aren't receivied.



On Dec 3, 2007 11:09 PM, Ladee Geek <ladeegeek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Tarun -
>
> I'm asking about the dynamic lmi that gives me my pvc not the dynamic
> frame-relay map of dlci to IP.  Can you tell me how I would turn off LMI
> if
> I am not to receive dynamic lmi infomraiton from the frame switch?
>
>
> ladee
>
>
>
>
> On 12/3/07, Tarun Pahuja <pahujat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > You sure will!
> > There are many issues that revolve around dynamic and static entries.
> >
> > Please read the last paragraph of this link and you will get a better
> > understanding.
> >
> >  <http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Olive>
> > http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=170741&seqNum=4&rl=1
> >
> > HTH,
> > Tarun
> >
> >
> >  On Dec 3, 2007 12:08 PM, <ladeegeek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > The LMI is communicating between the local frame switch and router.  I
> > > have a question about config verification and point structure.  If I
> have a
> > > main serial interface in the default nbma mode and no inverse arp I
> will not
> > > get any dynmaic maps.  No maps show up with sho frame map - as
> expected.
> > >  The sho lmi displays my communication to the frame switch is
> opperational -
> > > as expected.  BUT when I do a sho frame pvc - my pvc table is
> populated.
> > >
> > > I'm thinking that is the exact way it should show up.  No maps, my LMI
> > > connection active and the PVC table populated by the LMI data.
> > >
> > > Is there any way I would lose points on a router configured as such if
> > > the requirements were to not allow dynamic mappings? Should I be
> trying to
> > > find a way to control the LMI too?
> > >
> > > It's a matter of symantics.  There are no dynamic mappings, but my
> > > DLCI's and associated PVCs are dynamic?
> > >
> > > Thanks for the input.
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> r/
> Tammy
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html