Re: do not send Eigrp Hello on interfaces

[Cristian Ionescu <cristian.ionescu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for all responses.
I think the optin with net x.x.x.x 0.0.0.0 is the right one. I do not 
think that ACL is the soltion.

Also this problem rise another one.
What is the best way to announce net in a protocol?
Just to put the interface in the protocol with same command (where the 
protocol permit) or to announce the entire network?
What do you think about the grading in the real exam? I will get the 
points if i announce the /32 net. (of course if the task does not 
restrict me in any way, just says put this net/interface in the protocol 
domain)

Thanks

Dan C wrote:
> Hi George,
>
> If you need to add any other interfaces into eigrp you will need just to use
> 0.0.0.0 for them again eg:
>
> router ei 100
> net 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0
> net 1.1.2.1 0.0.0.0
>
> this way no hellos will be sent out but on those 2 interfaces.... You can
> verify using debug eigrp packets hello
> Cheers,
> Dan
>
> On 7/10/07, George Roman <georgeroman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
> > You are right about that. if you put the wildcard mask of 0.0.0.0 only
> > that
> > interface will participate in eigrp process, but if you want some other
> > networks (on other interfaces) to get advertised into eigrp, i think the
> > only solution is to put those interfaces in eigrp and use ACLs so you will
> > not send hellos on them (ACLs because as Cristian said, the
> > passive-interface command is forbidden).
> >
> > George
> >
> > On 7/10/07, Mark Mckillop (mmckillo) <mmckillo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >     
> > > I think the point is to use the 0.0.0.0 in the network statement to
> > > specify just the precise interfaces that you want enabled in the EIGRP
> > > process.
> > >
> > > i.e. network 150.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 -> Just the interface with that specific
> > > address
> > >
> > > Mark.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> > > George Roman
> > > Sent: 10 July 2007 12:32
> > > To: Cristian Ionescu; ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: do not send Eigrp Hello on interfaces
> > >
> > > I think one of the options that you have to filter eigrp is extended acl
> > > (specify the protocol eigrp)
> > >
> > > George
> > >
> > > On 7/10/07, Cristian Ionescu <cristian.ionescu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >       
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > I have a task where it says to not send eigrp hello on interfaces that
> > > >         
> > > > are not part of the eigrp domain but not to use passive-interface.
> > > > It is ok to use neighbor?
> > > > I have 4 routers on domain. I need to put in one router all 3 other
> > > > routers?
> > > >
> > > > If i put under the router eigrp x menu, network y.y.y.y 0.0.0.0 will
> > > > have the same result?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > ______________________________________________________________________
> > > > _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > > >         
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >       
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >     
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html