Thanks. It looks like the rx only restriction is also only on 3550.
3560 can handle both rx and tx...
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Darrin K. Pierce
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 1:26 PM
To: ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: any difference between these two?
If you slightly change your configuration, you can take advantage of
some
minor differences depending upon what you are trying to troubleshoot:
Router(config)# monitor session 1 source interface f0/10 rx
- Shows packets before switch processing is performed.
Router(config)# monitor session 1 source interface f0/10 tx
- Shows packets after switch processing has been performed
For example, packets that the switch drops because of an ACL are seen in
a
"rx" monitor session but not in the "tx" monitor session.
- "monitor session 1 source vlan 120 , 130" only monitors "rx"
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/12225see/scg/s
wspa
n.htm
Darrin
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Michael Zuo
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 10:22 PM
To: ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: any difference between these two?
Hi group,
I was wondering if the following two are equivalent (assuming interface
f0/10 is a trunk port and vlan 120/130 are not pruned from that port)?
Any subtle differences?
Config 1:
monitor session 1 source vlan 120 , 130
Config 2:
monitor session 1 source f0/10
monitor session 1 filter vlan 120, 130
thanks in advance...
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
