GroupStudy.com GroupStudy.com - A virtual community of network engineers
 Home  BookStore  StudyNotes  Links  Archives  StudyRooms  HelpWanted  Discounts  Login
Re: Frame Relay IETF posted 11/09/2006
[Chronological Index] [Thread Index] [Top] [Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]


On Spoke 2 router what if I enter a frame map for the other spoke

Would it be

frame map ip 172.1.24.142 301 IETF
or
frame map ip 172.1.24.142 301

This is basically my question


On 11/9/06, Adam Frederick <AFrederick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It is necessary to keep IETF consistent on the PVC.
>
> Example;
>
> Hub Router
> !
> interface serial0/0
> Encapsulaton frame-relay
> No frame-relay inverse-arp
> Bandwidth 1544
> Ip address 172.16.24.141 255.255.255.0
> Frame map ip 172.16.24.142 102 broad ietf
> Frame map ip 172.16.24.143 103 broad
> !
> !
> Spoke 1
> !
> Interface serial0/0/0.1 point-to-point
> Encapsulation frame-relay ietf
> Bandwidth 256
> Ip address 172.16.24.142 255.255.255.0
> Frame-relay interface-dlci 201
> !
> !
> Spoke 2
> !
> Interface serial0/0
> Encapsulation frame-relay
> No frame-relay inverse-arp
> Bandwidth 256
> Ip address 172.16.24.143 255.255.255.0
> Frame map ip 172.1.24.141 301 broad
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Ian Blaney
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 2:40 PM
> To: ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Frame Relay IETF
>
> I am sure this has been asked before but I cannot find the answer in the
> archives.
>
> In a frame relay hub and 2 spokes scenario with static mappings where
> one
> spoke is
> configured with RFC190 "encapsulation frame IETF". Is it necessary to
> configured
> IETF on the frame map of the other spoke as well as the hub?
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html