GroupStudy.com GroupStudy.com - A virtual community of network engineers
 Home  BookStore  StudyNotes  Links  Archives  StudyRooms  HelpWanted  Discounts  Login
Re: local policy route-map not working for me posted 11/07/2006
[Chronological Index] [Thread Index] [Top] [Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]


 Enable "ip policy route-map PING" under the interface.
On 11/6/06, Hafizur Rahman (Europe) <hafizur.rahman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Michael
>
> Try using extended ACl instead of prefix list
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Michael Zuo
> Sent: 07 November 2006 07:09
> To: ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: local policy route-map not working for me
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I am having a problem with my local policy routing and can not figure
> out why it is not working:
>
>
>
> Topology:
>
> =======
>
> R3, R4 and R6 forms a triangle
>
>
>
> Networks:
>
> =======
>
> Between R3, R4: 142.1.34.0/24
>
> Between R3, R6: 204.12.1.0/24
>
> Between R4, R6: 142.1.46.0/24
>
>
>
> R4 also have IP address 142.1.0.4
>
>
>
> OSPF is configured in a way that ping from R6 to 142.1.0.4 would go thru
> R3 first (R3 touches area 0)
>
>
>
> I am trying to use policy routing to route ICMP from R6 directly over
> the connection between R4 and R6 which is not in OSPF
>
>
>
> Configuration
>
> =======
>
>
>
> R6:
>
>
>
> router ospf 1
>
> log-adjacency-changes
>
> network 54.1.3.6 0.0.0.0 area 3
>
> network 204.12.1.6 0.0.0.0 area 3
>
>
>
> ip local policy route-map PING
>
> !
>
>
>
> ip prefix-list 10 seq 5 permit 142.1.0.0/24
>
> !
>
> !
>
> route-map PING permit 10
>
> match ip address prefix-list 10
>
> set ip next-hop 142.1.46.4
>
>
>
> Result
>
> =====
>
>
>
> R6(config)#do trace 142.1.0.4
>
>
>
> Type escape sequence to abort.
>
> Tracing the route to 142.1.0.4
>
>
>
> 1 204.12.1.3 0 msec 0 msec 4 msec
>
> 2 142.1.0.4 28 msec *  28 msec
>
> R6(config)#
>
>
>
> R6#sh ip loc pol
>
> Local policy routing is enabled, using route map PING
>
> route-map PING, permit, sequence 10
>
> Match clauses:
>
>    ip address prefix-lists: 10
>
> Set clauses:
>
>    ip next-hop 142.1.46.4
>
> Policy routing matches: 5 packets, 320 bytes
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Which means R6 still go thru R3 first before getting to R4!! Also, the
> packet count in "sh ip loc pol" does not increase
>
>
>
>
>
> Am I missing something obvious?  How do I debug further?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks a bunch!!
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Dimension Data - providing global IP based solutions and services
> for over 20 years supported locally from a single point of contact.
>
> This email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient
> then you must not copy it, forward it, use it for any purpose, or
> disclose it to another person.
>
> Please also note that the author of this email is not authorised
> to; make any offers capable of acceptance unless expressly stated
> in a validly dated and attached document which shall be subject to
> the terms and conditions stated therein or, conclude any contract
> on behalf of Dimension Data by email.
>
> Although Dimension Data has taken reasonable precautions to ensure
> no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept
> responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this
> email or attachments.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>



-- 
Narbik Kocharians
CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
CCSI# 30832
Network Learning, Inc. (CCIE class Instructor)
www.ccbootcamp.com (CCIE Training)