GroupStudy.com - CCIE, CCNA, CCNP and other Cisco Certifications

Home

BookStore

StudyNotes

Links

[Chronological Index] [Thread Index] [Top] [Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Subject: UDP and PIX
From: 2nd CCIE <doubleccie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 00:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=g7SUNePqoB/kCoL56zjfNdnDlTgzjOMXMJ22mG9Zw7WjSzJaWMOg8HlwAnLe5oCIg2IEG/t0cxQseH4KSU78EjI99pCoc0XhUDYNOBhOLtECjSiugRGzWdsIcowZlGiXGKVZfEWI2IYfrihv1SxZjzPbUiw55tP9PNMEtj/8fIs= ;

I just wonder if anyone can clarify this question for me 
  what the advantage of using PIX instead of ACL for the UDP traffic ?
   
  appreciate the help

 		
---------------------------------
Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com.  Check it out.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: UDP and PIX
  - From: Farrukh Haroon
- Re: UDP and PIX
  - From: V Shekhar
- CCIE via Remote LAB
  - From: V Shekhar

Prev by Date: BGP Set Weight
Next by Date: Re: UDP and PIX
Previous by thread: Re: BGP Set Weight
Next by thread: Re: UDP and PIX
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread