![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Re: BGP real world question posted 07/20/2005
|
Are you planning on using next-hop-self? That would influence the desicion in my mind. Ian www.ccie4u.com Rack Rentals starting at only $12 > I am converting my companies network from a hub and > spoke frame relay design to a MPLS setup. There are 36 > sites. The sites do not have any need to send traffic > to one another during normal operation but there are > some point to point and ISDN circuits between some of > the sites for use when the primary network is not > available. We are going to run BGP between us and the > MPLS provider. > > My question is whether it would be better to > redistribute connected interfaces into BGP at the > remote sites or to use BGP network statements. The > main difference that I can see is that there would be > less typing just to redistribute connected. Is there a > compelling reason to choose either option? > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection > around http://mail.yahoo.com > > __________________________________________________________ > _____________ Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Ian Stong http://www.ccie4u.com "Rack Rentals and Lab Scenarios starting at only $20" support@xxxxxxxxxx