RE: stupid question BGP Next-hop-self

["Georg Pauwen" <pauwen@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

either one will work, it depends on what the requirement is. I think Cisco 
prefers not to redistribute BGP into the IGP, so the next-hop-self on R2 
probably is the better option.

Regards,

Georg

> From: inlink <inlink@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: inlink <inlink@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: stupid question BGP Next-hop-self
> Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 15:15:57 +0900
>
>  Hi, all
> IF R3 know ebgp(bb1) next-hop-self via igp(rip),
> does r2 need to next-hop-self for r3?
>
> 197.68.22.0---BB1--------R2----------R3
> EBGP IBGP
> 1.
> R3# sh ip bgp
> *> i197.68.22.0 150.100.1.254(BB1) 0 100 0 254 253 i
>
> R3#sh ip ro rip 150.100.1.0
> R 150.100.1.0 [120/1] via R2, 00:00:26, Serial0/0(R2)
>
> 2. r2 next-hop-self
> R3# sh ip bgp
> *> i197.68.22.0 2.2.2.2(R2) 0 100 0 254 253 i
>
> Which answer is more exactly ?
>
> [IMAGE]
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Messenger : discutez en direct avec vos amis ! 
http://www.msn.fr/msger/default.asp