RE: Redistribute connected route-map ? posted 03/18/2004
- Subject: RE: Redistribute connected route-map ?
- From: Richard Dumoulin <richard.dumoulin@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:56:12 -0000
Hi Sally, with OSPF I think that If you advertise networks by both "network"
and "redistribute connected" you'll have the same network in different
lsa's, external and router,
De: Sally Crawford [mailto:crawford0982003@xxxxxxxxx]
Enviado el: jueves, 18 de marzo de 2004 0:27
Asunto: Redistribute connected route-map ?
When redistributing connected routes, do we have to create a route-map to
specify which connected interfaces are to be redistributed if the interface
is already been redistributed by another routing protocol ? Im confused,
some LABs im doing are inconsistent with its use of the route-map command.
Further , are there any issues that could arise by redistributing
interfaces via connected ( without route-map ) and the same interface via a
routing protocol. Or am I totally wrong and it depends on the routing
protocol. that I am redistributing the connected route into ?
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
Subscription information may be found at: