Re: CBWFQ and Frame-Relay posted 06/26/2003
Thursday, June 26, 2003, 7:04:29 AM, you wrote:
b> Hello badger,
b> Wednesday, June 25, 2003, 8:38:26 PM, you wrote:
b>> Hello ccielab,
b>> I'm still struggling with a basic issue of how to apply the service
b>> policy to a frame interface. I have two scenarios that are still
b>> puzzling and welcome anyone to offer up a solution/explanation.
b>> The first scenario is on a FR physical interface and the basic two
b>> questions here are (1) do you need to turn on "traffic shaping" for the
b>> service policy to work (2) are you required to use the "frame-relay
b>> map-class xxx
b>> service-policy yyy"
b>> Or, does the service policy get applied directly to the interface
b>> such as "service-policy output yyy"
b>> As a side note...it may be my code, 12.1(14)T, but whenever I use the
b>> "frame-relay map-class xxx" method, my routers instantly reload!
b>> The second scenario is on a FR interface with two point-to-point sub
b>> interfaces. Say I want to the same service-policy to be applied to
b>> both the sub interfaces, redundant links, then the question(s) are
b>> (1) Again, does FR traffic shaping need to be enabled? (2) does the
b>> service policy get applied to the physical interface, or to both sub
b>> interfaces? (3) Whatever the answer is to (2), do I use the
b>> "frame-relay map class" method, or apply the "service-policy output
b>> yyy" directly to physical/sub-interface?
b>> I have read many docs, books, and examples and seen this accomplished
b>> in so many ways that my head is still spinning, but I would really
b>> like to get this nailed down.
b>> Thanks and
b> My own followup to post:
b> If I apply the service policy directly to the physical FR interface,
b> and do a "sho policy-map interface serx," then I can see my service
b> policy is applied. However, if I apply the service policy using the
b> "frame-relay map-class yyy" and then so the sho policy-map interface
b> Serx, my service policy is no longer applied to the interface.
b> Is there another show command that will show me that the policy is
b> applied to my FR interface when using the "frame-relay map-class yyy"
b> method of applying the policy?
b> Now to really confuse myself even more, what if I am actually doing
b> trafiic shaping on the FR interface and also have a CBWFQ policy
b> map applied under my frame-relay map class? According to the above
b> "sho" output results, the CBWFQ wont apply.
b> Thanks, still confused, need help.
If anyone was considering responding to this request, rest easy...I've
finally figured out this entire mess and have it nailed!