RE: OSPF with secondary IP's posted 06/05/2003
I'm surprised that you were able to get the neighbors established. I
agree with Tim that they effectively are on uncommon subnets. I tried
several approaches unsuccessfully. What configuration did you use to
form the neighbor adjacencies?
>>> <Danny.Andaluz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 06/04/03 09:26AM >>>
Thanks for all the responses, guys. I tried this in my lab and what I
found is that they will become neighbors but no routes are learned.
From: Snow, Tim [mailto:timothy.snow@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:23 AM
To: Andaluz, Danilo, Triaton/NA
Subject: RE: OSPF with secondary IP's
Negative, you'll get errors due to the fact that the router will source
the OSPF hellos (assuming you put the primary into a OSPF area) from the
primary interfaces. Much the same way you'll see "not on common subnet"
errors with EIGRP.
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:01 PM
Subject: OSPF with secondary IP's
ip address 126.96.36.199 255.255.255.0
ip address 188.8.131.52 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 184.108.40.206 255.255.255.0
ip address 220.127.116.11 255.255.255.0 secondary
Both networks are under OSPF in the same area. Will the two routers
Danny Andaluz, CCNP
Triaton, North America