GroupStudy.com GroupStudy.com - A virtual community of network engineers
 Home  BookStore  StudyNotes  Links  Archives  StudyRooms  HelpWanted  Discounts  Login
RE: BGP load sharing. posted 04/26/2003
[Chronological Index] [Thread Index] [Top] [Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]


And I believe that you can eliminate the consideration of the RouterID in
the Best Path calculation. There is a command

Router(config-router)#no bgp bestpath compare-routerid

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
D. J. Jones
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 4:48 PM
To: pandoraytchan@xxxxxxxxxxx; ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: BGP load sharing.


Tthe route with the lowest router id is preferred; in this case #2 since
5.5.5.5 is lower than 6.6.6.6..dj

----- Original Message -----
From: <pandoraytchan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 8:42 AM
Subject: BGP load sharing.


> Hi all,
>
> R1 #sh ip bgp 193.16.1.0
> BGP routing table entry for 193.16.1.0/24, version 4
> Paths: (2 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
>   Advertised to non peer-group peers:
>   10.1.1.2
>   3 4
>     10.1.1.2 from 10.1.1.2 (6.6.6.6)
>       Origin incomplete, metric 200, localpref 100, valid, external
>   1 4
>     172.17.1.2 from 172.17.1.2 (5.5.5.5)
>       Origin incomplete, metric 200, localpref 100, valid, external, best
>
>
> All of the route attribute (except the as number received) is same, why
the
> maximum-path x does not take effect?
>
> Does the maximum-path is only apply in the route which come from "same"
and
> only one AS?
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
> Pandora.