Hi all guys,
As I know, the scenario 1 and 2 are absolutely right. But to the three, I
think there isn't such a solution for OSPF to originate a default route to
OSPF domain. I just tried it in my lab once again. No any type 5 in OSPF
database generate by my commands as below:
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.2.1
router ospf 1
redistribute static subnets
I also tried using Rip(generate 0.0.0.0) + router ospf 1-> redistribute rip
subnets. The result is the same.
Do your practices in your lab succeed to the third scenario?
Thanks for your clearance in advance and Merry Christmas to all of your kind
members!
Richard Hanks
----- Original Message -----
Wrom: RHDMNNSKVFVWRKJVZCM
To: ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:51 PM
Subject: Default information originate..... OSPF
Senerio 1 ---> On an ASBR you use the "Default-Information originate"
command and have a static default defined. My understanding of this command
is that OSPF will pick the default up and propagate it.
Senerio 2 -----> On an ASBR you use the "default-information originate
always" command and OSPF will inject a default route into its domain .
Senerio 3----> you Create a static default and redistribute the static into
OSPF.
Question...in senerio 2 what interface does OSPF choose as its next hop
interface on the router that you put the command on ie the ASBR
Question......Are all these senerios basicaly doing the same thing and if
there is a difference..what is it?
Thankyou for any input you might provide.
Junaid
.
.
__________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with the body containing:
unsubscribe ccielab
