RE: RIP Auto-summary posted 12/05/2002
- Subject: RE: RIP Auto-summary
- From: "Joe Martin" <jmartin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 11:54:08 -0700
- In-reply-to: <2DF0535AC3EBD411A72A00508BAFA91D0D1F77B2@sbcisexch1w.pbi.n et>
I was running v1 with discontiguous subnets just to see what the debugs
would look like. I knew this would not work. Then I switched to v2 and the
discontiguous subnets show up in the RIP database, but so do the summary
routes, even after a reload.
From: MOLINA, MARTIN J (PBI) [mailto:mm1343@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:45 AM
To: 'Joe Martin'; CCIE GroupStudy
Subject: RE: RIP Auto-summary
This might be a silly question but are you running RIP Version 2 ?
From: Joe Martin [mailto:jmartin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:32 AM
To: CCIE GroupStudy
Subject: RIP Auto-summary
Why, if I enter the "no auto-summary" command under the RIP process, do I
still have summary routes at the classful boundary in the RIP database?
Maybe just a total brain fart? What am I missing?
To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with the body containing: