Re: Frame Relay back-to-back on T1 CSU/DSU module posted 10/18/2002
I think so, too. But I will have to check just to make sure. Probably I will
end up calling Tom.
I know that MPPP requires a lot of processing power, for example on 3640
depending on the other stuff happening on the same box, you can hit a very
high CPU utilization.
#7247 (R&S, Security)
Phone (847) 674-3392
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sam Munzani" <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Peter" <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: Frame Relay back-to-back on T1 CSU/DSU module
> After I posted on group, I found a good CCO document explaining all about
it. Also, you need to disable keepalive on physical interface(This will
> Now another twist to the question,
> If I have 2 T1 back-to-back links, what's better bundling option?
Multilink PPP or FRF.16(With back to back Frame Relay)? So far FRF.16 looks
more locrative option.
> > Sam,
> > Yes, you can do back to back F/R. You just need to map to the same DLCI
> > both sides or if you are using subinterfaces do frame-relay
> > with the same DLCI.
> > __________________________
> > Peter Puczko
> > #7247 (R&S, Security)
> > Phone (847) 674-3392
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Sam Munzani" <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 4:16 PM
> > Subject: Frame Relay back-to-back on T1 CSU/DSU module
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > How can you do Frame Relay encapsulation back to back with 2
> > > CSU/DSU modules with T1 cross over cable)?
> > >
> > > Any suggestions? I want to do 2 circuits just like this and bundle
> > using
> > > FRF.16
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sam Munzani
> > > CCIE # 6479 (R&S)