Re: Lab solutions validation : Was RE: 3rd time worst! posted 10/09/2002
- Subject: Re: Lab solutions validation : Was RE: 3rd time worst!
- From: Hansang Bae <hbae@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 02:05:11 -0400
- In-reply-to: <OFB77D541A.D4EDFACD-ON48256C4C.00149056-48256C4C.0014BDD3@ c a-indosuez.com>
At 11:48 AM 10/8/2002 +0800, Donny MATEO wrote:
>I know that one it is in the question of the Lab and I did mentioned it in my mail below
>(ofcourse within the restriction and traffic policing that the lab asked
>you to do).
>So if you routing table is correct and your connectivity is ok in accordance of the LAB rule, is
>there anything else that you can think of that can influence the lab.
>I can think of one, misinterpretation of the question, but thats about all I can think of
a) use extended pings and use the "far side" interface as the source.
b) use "sho ip route | include 00:00" to check for routing loops or flapping routes.
Sho ip route will time stamp the age of the route. Most should not have 00:00 as the leading digits. This is one quick way to spot flappgin routes.