I think I am a little late but ;
can't we summarize these networks
200.3.3.0/24
200.4.3.0/24
as
ac 1 per 200.3.3.0 0.1.0.255
since 200.6.3.0/25 has different mask I think we must configure a seperate
ACL line for this network
Any ideas ?
Yigit
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Chua,
Parry
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 7:02 AM
To: Kang BS; ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Complex Access-list
200.6.3.0/25 and 200.6.3.128/25 are the subnet of 200.6.3.0/24, the
access-list 2 should take care of this.
>! this should permit 200.x.3.y, where x, y any value from 0 to 255
>access-list 2 permit 200.0.3.0 0.255.0.255
Parry Chua
-----Original Message-----
From: Kang BS [mailto:avantus1@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 12:36 PM
To: Chua, Parry; ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Complex Access-list
Thank you,
But the access-list you suggested can't filter 200.6.3.0/25.
I think it's impossible to filter with one access-list.
BS Kang.
_________________________________________________________________
Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html
Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
_________________________________________________________________
Commercial lab list: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/commercial.html
Please discuss commercial lab solutions on this list.
__________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with the body containing:
unsubscribe ccielab
