GroupStudy.com GroupStudy.com - A virtual community of network engineers
 Home  BookStore  StudyNotes  Links  Archives  StudyRooms  HelpWanted  Discounts  Login
RE: ccbootcamp 8 - bgp always-compare-med posted 05/20/2001
[Chronological Index] [Thread Index] [Top] [Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]


Ken, you have to put "no sync" on R6 to make this work

iBGP routes didn't want to synchronize because the routing table didn't have those routers from another IGP

From: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "rsevier" <rsevier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Roman Rodichev" <rodic000@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: ccbootcamp 8 - bgp always-compare-med
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 17:53:48 -0500


Hi Raymond,

I though about this too. I redistribute OSPF into BGP only on R1 in the
beginning. R8 didn't receive all AS2 routes.

I do a show ip bgp in R6, the routes that didn't advertise across R6--> R8
have not > (best routes) on them.

I have to redistribute OSPF into BGP on R6 to make it work. Below is my SHOW
IP BGP on R6 after redistribute OSPF into BGP on R1 and R6.


r6#sh ip bgp
BGP table version is 271, local router ID is 137.20.60.1
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
internal
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete

   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 137.20.10.0/24   137.20.64.5             20         32768 ?
* i137.20.20.0/24   137.20.25.2            129    100      0 ?
*>                  137.20.64.5             71         32768 ?
* i137.20.25.0/24   137.20.25.1              0    100      0 ?
*>                  137.20.64.5             70         32768 ?
* i137.20.30.0/24   137.20.25.2            129    100      0 ?
*>                  137.20.64.5             71         32768 ?
* i137.20.33.0/24   137.20.25.2            129    100      0 ?
*>                  137.20.64.5             71         32768 ?
* i137.20.40.16/28  137.20.25.2            164    100      0 ?
*>                  137.20.64.5            106         32768 ?
*>i137.20.60.0/24   137.20.25.2             71    100      0 ?
*>i137.20.64.0/20   137.20.25.2             70    100      0 ?
*> 137.20.81.0/24   137.20.86.1              0             0 1 i
*> 137.20.82.0/24   137.20.86.1              0             0 1 i
* i137.20.100.33/32 137.20.25.2            128    100      0 ?
*>                  137.20.64.5             70         32768 ?
* i137.20.100.34/32 137.20.25.2             64    100      0 ?
*>                  137.20.64.5              6         32768 ?
* i137.20.100.35/32 137.20.25.2            128    100      0 ?
*>                  137.20.64.5             70         32768 ?
* i137.20.200.16/28 137.20.25.2            164    100      0 ?
*>                  137.20.64.5            106         32768 ?
* i137.20.240.0/20  137.20.25.2             65    100      0 ?
*>                  137.20.64.5              7         32768 ?
* i160.0.0.0/4      137.20.10.70           170    100      0 3 i
*>                  137.20.64.5              1         32768 ?
* i160.10.10.0/24   137.20.10.70           170    100      0 3 i
* i161.10.10.0/24   137.20.10.70           170    100      0 3 i
* i170.10.10.0/24   137.20.10.70           170    100      0 3 i
* i172.168.70.0/24  137.20.10.70           170    100      0 3 i
*> 172.168.80.0/24  137.20.86.1              0             0 1 i
* i200.200.100.0    137.20.25.2            129    100      0 ?
*>                  137.20.64.5             71         32768 ?
*> 200.200.200.0    137.20.64.5             71         32768 ?

-----Original Message-----
From: rsevier [mailto:rsevier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 11:30 AM
To: Roman Rodichev; kenyeo@xxxxxxxxx; ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: ccbootcamp 8 - bgp always-compare-med


I agree that bgp always-compare-med is not needed. however, I have another one for you. Does there need to be redistribution on r1 of ospf into bgp. I know that redistribution of bgp into ospf is needed. I have just completed 8a and didn't find a reason to for the redistribution on r1 of ospf into bgp. Our solution worked fine with out it because of the it is being redistributed on r6. Can I get any input as to why it is in the answers from Marc.

thanks in advance
Raymond

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Roman Rodichev
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 11:31 PM
To: kenyeo@xxxxxxxxx; ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: ccbootcamp 8 - bgp always-compare-med


I thought so too



>From: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@xxxxxxxxx> >Reply-To: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@xxxxxxxxx> >To: <ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Subject: ccbootcamp 8 - bgp always-compare-med >Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 01:06:44 -0500 > >on r1 > >I believe bgp always-compare-med is not needed. > >Anyone can comfirm that? > >Thanks! >Ken Yeo >**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com **Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
_______________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with the body containing:
unsubscribe ccielab