From: "rsevier" <rsevier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Roman Rodichev" <rodic000@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <kenyeo@xxxxxxxxx>,
<ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: ccbootcamp 8 - bgp always-compare-med
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 09:30:07 -0700
I agree that bgp always-compare-med is not needed. however, I have another
one for you. Does there need to be redistribution on r1 of ospf into bgp.
I know that redistribution of bgp into ospf is needed. I have just
completed 8a and didn't find a reason to for the redistribution on r1 of
ospf into bgp. Our solution worked fine with out it because of the it is
being redistributed on r6. Can I get any input as to why it is in the
answers from Marc.
thanks in advance
Raymond
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Roman Rodichev
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 11:31 PM
To: kenyeo@xxxxxxxxx; ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: ccbootcamp 8 - bgp always-compare-med
I thought so too
>From: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@xxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: "Ken Yeo" <kenyeo@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: <ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: ccbootcamp 8 - bgp always-compare-med
>Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 01:06:44 -0500
>
>on r1
>
>I believe bgp always-compare-med is not needed.
>
>Anyone can comfirm that?
>
>Thanks!
>Ken Yeo
>**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
**Please read:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html