RE: DLSW+ Encapsulation posted 01/31/2001
Thanks a lot guys...That really explains a lot...
From: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 1:35 AM
To: 'Simon Hope'; Ccielab
Subject: RE: DLSW+ Encapsulation
Indeed true - you need to use TCP to support Ethernet bridge domains...
Justin Menga CCIE #6640 MCSE+I CCSE
Computerland New Zealand
PO Box 3631, Auckland
DDI: (+64) 9 360 4864 Mobile: (+64) 25 349 599
From: Simon Hope [mailto:shope@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 11:35 PM
Subject: Re: DLSW+ Encapsulation
I thought DLSW with FST and Direct encap only supported token ring attached
endstations, not Ethernet attached endstations. with FST you can have
ethernet in the IP cloud obviously. As your end stations are ethernet
attached then traffic will not be passed. FST also does not support local
ack, so will pass the RIF thru to the remote ring
I remember reading this in Cisco Network Design and Case Studies, see
chapter 8: DLSW Advanced features.
To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with the body containing: