- A virtual community of network engineers
 Home  BookStore  StudyNotes  Links  Archives  StudyRooms  HelpWanted  Discounts  Login
RE: DLSW+ Encapsulation posted 01/31/2001
[Chronological Index] [Thread Index] [Top] [Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Thanks a lot guys...That really explains a lot...


-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Justin Menga
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 1:35 AM
To: 'Simon Hope'; Ccielab
Subject: RE: DLSW+ Encapsulation

Indeed true - you need to use TCP to support Ethernet bridge domains...


Justin Menga  CCIE #6640  MCSE+I  CCSE
WAN Specialist
Computerland New Zealand
PO Box 3631, Auckland
DDI: (+64) 9 360 4864   Mobile:  (+64) 25 349 599
mailto: justin.menga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Hope [mailto:shope@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 11:35 PM
To: Ccielab
Subject: Re: DLSW+ Encapsulation

I thought DLSW with FST and Direct encap only supported token ring attached
endstations, not Ethernet attached endstations. with FST you can have
ethernet in the IP cloud obviously. As your end stations are ethernet
attached then traffic will not be passed. FST also does not support local
ack, so will pass the RIF thru to the remote ring

I remember reading this in Cisco Network Design and Case Studies, see
chapter 8: DLSW Advanced features.



To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with the body containing:
unsubscribe ccielab