GroupStudy.com GroupStudy.com - A virtual community of network engineers
 Home  BookStore  StudyNotes  Links  Archives  StudyRooms  HelpWanted  Discounts  Login
Re: ccbootcamp Lab 1 (Warning - Spoiler) posted 01/17/2001
[Chronological Index] [Thread Index] [Top] [Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]


I have found a number of errant commads in the bootcamp labs that I hazzard
a guess are used in some of the other lab scenarios.


----- Original Message -----
From: Adrian Chew <achew@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ccielab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 6:48 PM
Subject: ccbootcamp Lab 1 (Warning - Spoiler)


> Running through the ccbootcamp labs again - it just occured to me that in
> the answers, they have the policy routing route-map applied on the serial
> frame-relay links.  Seems odd to me to have them there - as route-maps are
> applied to packets arriving at the interface (ie. incoming, not outgoing),
> so instead this should be applied on the non-frame interfaces.
>
> Since local traffic (ie. generated from the router) takes effect via the
ip
> local policy statement, I can't figure a reason to have the policy routing
> statements enabled on the serial links.  Instead, I would have them on the
> other links, and having it only on the Serial 1 interface of R3 so R4 can
> get to R2 and R5 to meet the requirements of all routers being able to
ping
> each other.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> _______________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
> majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with the body containing:
> unsubscribe ccielab
>

_______________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with the body containing:
unsubscribe ccielab