 |
 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Re: Subnet mask/ OSPF Routing [1:3308] posted 04/15/2001
|
I've set this up before but that was some time ago and wouldn't you believe it I didn't take any notes (the one time) I believe it was a subnet mask thing then just like Cisco press mentions in Ch 7. I do remember somthing about having to go to /16 mask somewhere but can't remember - running NT4 OS - The trace route from Host A to Router B stops at the 172.16.30.2 so I'm getting 1 hop out of host A and to Router B int e0/0 the 30.1 address. When I trace route from Router B to host B there is no problem showing all hops. Also when I trace from Host B to Host A all hops are showing up - now this works fine when I add a static route to Host A stating that network 172.16.10.0 mask 255.255.255.0 g/w 172.16.30.2 Also there is no route in Host B's route table to Host A, but again it can ping it just fine letting the router to it's job - my sh ip cache shows on both router showes both sides just fine it's direcly connected ip as well as the network address on the far side of the network - the sh ip route seems to be normal showing the network addresss on the opposite router ie. Router B shows the connected routes and the OSPF route 172.16.10.0 via 172.16.20.1 the Router A shows OSPF route 30.0 via 20.2 which is the way it's supposed to be - Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=1&i=3315&t=3308 -------------------------------------------------- Read http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html before POSTING! You are reading GroupStudy's Associate Mailing List. To unsubscribe follow the directions on http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
